I wrote an article about how there is one extra woman in Malaysia’s new parliament.
Actually, it’s not even that good.
The numbers did not change at all.
My initial article did get some scrutiny regarding the make-up of Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) women parliamentarians.
In it, I said:
Five of the nine women elected for PR were from its component party Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). Two were from Parti SeIslam Malaysia (PAS), including Siti Mariam Mahmud in Kota Raja. It is believed that, despite coming from PAS, Siti Mariam won her seat in 2008 due to support from Chinese and Indian voters. The other two women elected for PR were from the Democratic Action Party (DAP).
A reader quickly pointed out that although nine women were indeed elected from PR, the make-up was a little different from what I had said. Instead, four were from DAP, three from PKR, and two from PAS.
The number of nine women from the opposition has stayed correct throughout other analyses, but the number of women from BN has changed considerably.
My initial analysis, published on May 6, had the number of women elected for BN at 15.
On May 13, the Malay Mail reported that 11 women had been elected to the federal parliament for BN.
On that same day, DAP politicians Teresa Kok, Lim Lip Eng and Ong Kian Ming released a statement that said 13 women had been elected for BN.
Is anyone else noticing a huge discrepancy here?
Today, a former colleague published a piece at the Malaysian Insider (MI) using similar numbers to the politicians’ statement.
I contacted asking her where she had gotten her numbers, and she acknowledged that she had seen the three different figures provided but decided to go with those on the statement.
So I started to look at my data again. The Malaysian non-governmental organization Empower had set up a website to help monitor women’s participation in the 13th general election.
In examining the gender make-up of the new parliament, I had relied on data from that website to list the women candidates standing, and then as the results came in keep track of which of them had won seats.
Table 1: Elected PR women parliamentarians.
STATE | PARLIAMENT CODE | PARLIAMENT NAME | PARTY | NAME OF CANDIDATE |
KELANTAN | P023 | RANTAU PANJANG | PAS | SITI ZAILAH MOHD YUSOFF |
PULAU PINANG | P046 | BATU KAWAN | DAP | KASTHURIRAANI A/P PATTO |
PAHANG | P083 | KUANTAN | PKR | FUZIAH SALLEH |
SELANGOR | P099 | AMPANG | PKR | ZURAIDA KAMARUDDIN |
SELANGOR | P111 | KOTA RAJA | PAS | SITI MARIAM MAHMUD |
WP KUALA LUMPUR | P121 | LEMBAH PANTAI | PKR | NURUL IZZAH ANWAR |
WP KUALA LUMPUR | P122 | SEPUTAH | DAP | TERESA KOK |
JOHOR | P163 | KULAI | DAP | TEO NIE CHING |
SARAWAK | P211 | LANANG | DAP | ALICE LAU KIONG YIENG |
According to the information I had in my spreadsheet, the numbers I had were correct. There was no issue with the number of women politicians elected for PR, so I started to look at the politicians elected for BN.
And I started to look not only at my data, but also the data of others on whom I had relied.
Therein, I found a problem. In my data, and that of Empower’s, I had one BN candidate listed as a female when he was in fact a man.
Table 2: Elected BN women parliamentarians.
STATE | PARLIAMENT CODE | PARLIAMENT NAME | PARTY | NAME OF CANDIDATE |
SELANGOR | P093 | SUNGAI BESAR | UMNO | NORIAH KASNON |
MALACCA | P134 | MASJID TANAH | UMNO | MAS ERMIEYATI SAMUDIN |
JOHOR | P147 | PARIT SULONG | UMNO | NORAINI AHMAD |
JOHOR | P155 | TENGGARA | UMNO | HALIMAH MOHD SADIQUE |
JOHOR | P157 | PENGERANG | UMNO | AZALINA OTHMAN |
JOHOR | P159 | PASIR GUDANG | UMNO | NORMALA ABDUL SAMAD |
SABAH | P175 | PAPAR | UMNO | ROSNAH ABDUL SHIRLIN |
SABAH | P177 | BEAUFORT | UMNO | AZIZAH MOHD DUN |
SABAH | P185 | BATU SAPI | PBS | LISA TSEN THAU LIN |
SABAH | P190 | TAWAU | PBS | MARY YAP KAIN CHING |
SARAWAK | P197 | KOTA SAMARAHAN | PBB | RUBIAH WANG |
SARAWAK | P200 | BATANG SADONG | PBB | NANCY SHUKRI |
SARAWAK | P201 | BATANG LUPAR | PBB | ROHANI ABDUL KARIM |
SARAWAK | P206 | TANJONG MANIS | PBB | NORAH ABDUL RAHIM |
My former colleague who had written the MI piece also clued in very quickly. I had sent her my data, in the hope of getting to the bottom of these different numbers.
I had made a mistake in my initial analysis. I cannot blame Empower for this error, as a quick Google search on the concerned candidate would have cleared this up.
The work that not just Empower, but many women’s organizations in Malaysia, have done to promote women’s political participation in Malaysia is truly remarkable. Empower has done a great job in acting as a watchdog on women’s role in the 13th general election.
But at the same time, I have to wonder: how was this not a big deal earlier? How did no other journalist or researcher think to hold people who had offered these numbers earlier to account?
Why is the number of women elected to parliament something that only individuals with a particular niche should care about?
Shouldn’t we all be concerned that, despite the lip service both sides of the political divide paid to women’s empowerment in the run-up to this election, nothing really changed?
That in fact, when it comes to women’s political participation in Malaysia, what we are seeing is the same pattern being repeated over and over?
I wrote this piece because to put an end to the incorrect figures now circulating on Malaysian women parliamentarians, and I had to acknowledge my role in allowing that to happen.
However, I worry that the lack of concern and lack of willingness to do further research on these numbers is perhaps indicative of how ingrained our belief in women’s issues as a cross between a non-issue and a niche is.